Friday, July 17, 2009

re: discriminating against white males or don't think we are so different

This is frustrating, but I'm not going to indulge in the "American's are so racist and teribbler-er than us (Canada)" because we have our own deep-seated, perhaps more passive nowadays but no less historically blood soaked, intolerances. Watch this and cringe and yet, hope:



I think it's silly to use the fact that Sotomayor called herself an "affirmative action baby" - she's saying that to show the good of affirmative action, not apologizing for herself.

This is like saying it's discriminating to have a First Nations, African, Women's Centre or LGBT Centre (like we have at my University) but not a Men's Centre. Until the freaking globe isn't a Men's Centre, they are creating a safe and empowered place for groups who have traditionally been given neither safety nor power.

And "evil affirmative action" is the most ridiculous phrase I've ever heard. I don't even think Pat Buchanan is evil. Don't be throwing that word around so much, people.

Kudos to Maddow for giving him his say and then straight up saying he's "wrong," "dated" and "privileging race" i.e. is being racist. Shutting down opinons is not the way, but rather responding to them intelligently, calmly and with BALLS (ok, so technically she has none but you get my drift).

I've had it with Conservative Republican loudmouths - let's get intelligent debate going on here (on both sides of the border). They don't know how their own system works (see Glen Beck), cannot maintain a rational,cohesive argument (see Bill O'Reilly), are outright terrible people (see Ann Coulter, who even makes Bill O. look reasonable and may be closer to the E word than I've ever encountered) or all of the above (see all of the above).

UPDATE: Dr. Stephen T. Colbert discusses "reverse racism" and "reverse civil rights leader Pat Buchanan." LOLWHIMPER.

To counter the utter terror and frustration that is fighting to dominate my opinon of North American politics, here is the cutest thing ever:




I'm not tickilish but I understand how this would rock.

4 comments:

Rob said...

it really is the cutest thing ever. Also, you're expecting rational debate on American media? You are a sickening optimist.

maegant said...

I'm wishing for it, both there and here. Maybe soon that will happen.

I do like that Obama pretty much shuts down stupid questions and calls Fox News on it's stuff.

And now that the Green Party has said that they will be upping the ante maybe they'll start doing the same.

maegant said...

To show my balance I'll link ppl to the right wing version of MediaMatters.org which is AIM.org.

Judge for yourself.

Wow, ok?

Concerned White Male Type Person said...

To argue that by excluding white males a place to feel empowered and safe is a product of the face that they should feel safe and empowered everywhere is narrow and silly. If anything, the pure reactionary resentment fomented in the minds of the people who you say do deserve especial empowerment and safety is enough to castrate that empowerment from the white males with no place to go.

I see where you are going with this, but I have a few qualms. By mandating these places for minorities, states and institutions are essentially saying that these groups are separate, unequal and weak, a wholly counterproductive to their aims, and at the same time casts an entire group as antagonist, making for sponsored divisions.

I'm all for empowerment, but every time that empowerment follows some dig at privileged white males as all powerful it just makes it look trite and mean.

WASP's have feelings too.